Community Letter: Concerns Over Breckenridge's Stringent and Hasty Dark Sky Regulations

In response to Frank Mason’s Dec. 10 letter advocating for dark sky measures, a Breckenridge resident emphasizes the importance of prioritizing dark sky conditions over pursuing certification. While recognizing the benefits of reduced light pollution for both community well-being and wildlife, the writer critiques the push for an artificial deadline for certification, arguing that it might not enhance tourism and overlooks existing regulations established in 2006. Instead, the town council should consider implementing a curfew on unnecessary outdoor lighting to protect migratory birds and night predators. The author highlights the lack of community support for the certification due to concerns among homeowners about the financial burden of compliance, especially since many homes predate current lighting standards. A comparison is made to Aspen’s approach, which encourages compliance without imposing immediate replacement requirements. Ultimately, the author suggests that a more flexible strategy could garner broader community support for the initiative.

Community Letter: Concerns Over Breckenridge’s Stringent and Hasty Dark Sky Regulations

Innovative Approach Aims to Decrease Shark Attacks

New LED Bulb from Lighting Science Group Aims for Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize

Beyond Bridge Lighting: Hoan Bridge Continues to Shine for the Community

Lighting Science Group Partners with Sprouts Farmers Market for Energy-Efficient LED Lighting Solutions